Critical control points for conventional aseptic processing are most often related to contamination resulting from human intervention and exposure of critical surfaces before and during fill. Extensive resources are required to install and maintain controls for these typical failure modes which can lead to two critical issues: shortages of essential medicines and inability to meet the timelines critical to control emerging pandemic threats.
When the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in the Sandoz v. Amgen litigation earlier this year, many were hoping for a decision that would clarify some key issues pertaining to the requirements of the BPCIA. But the decision left a number of questions unanswered.
Microbial control is critical in cleanroom environments. Contaminated environments can lead to product recalls, regulatory observations, fines, or even consumer deaths. In order to properly prevent, destroy, and monitor microbial contamination in cleanrooms, several aspects of cleanroom microbiology must be understood. This four-part article provides a foundational introduction to some of those aspects.
It seems blockchain technology is following the hype path the cloud did a few years ago. The most talked-about example of blockchain is Bitcoin, a digital currency that does not rely on a central authority (such as the Federal Reserve) to clear financial transactions. A few short months ago, the word “blockchain” was seldom mentioned in supply chain circles. Now, it’s not uncommon to be asked what your blockchain strategy is within those same circles. What has changed is its successful use and blockchain platforms adding functionality.
Failures in data governance and data integrity have been more prominent in health authority enforcement actions in the past few years. Health authorities review thousands of pages of data in original submissions and supplements covering the broad GxP area. Inspectors then review manufacturing and test data on-site during pre-approval inspections and routine GMP inspections.
The U.S. biosimilar market is relatively new. It took another two years for the FDA to issue the first draft guidelines for developing and registering a biosimilar in the United States, and another three years until the first biosimilar was approved.
Pharmaceutical companies operating in the U.S. are facing challenges in 2017 and beyond related to how their products are assessed by regulators and paid for by insurers and customers. But new opportunities are emerging, and patient engagement is the key to unlocking them. New regulatory developments at the FDA and beyond allow companies to leverage patient experiences and behaviors to create better products, obtain faster regulatory approvals, and better demonstrate the value of their products over time to payers and reimbursement bodies.
In the last decade, the healthcare industry has witnessed significant changes, some of which present important challenges to how pharmaceutical companies develop drugs. One such challenge is the shift in influence from the physician to the payer in the adoption of new interventions. This article discusses threats to the traditional model of drug development posed by the increasing influence of payers and considers ways for industry to embrace “value-focused development” to simultaneously adapt to the evolving market and de-risk drug development.
The first installment in this two-part series examined rising costs associated with orphan drugs and two related case studies. This second part provides actionable suggestions for developers.
On June 12, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Amgen v. Sandoz, penned by Justice Clarence Thomas. The Court addressed two questions, stemming from the Federal Circuit’s 2015 decision in the case, on which certiorari had been granted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|