Article | October 24, 2025

Why Manual QbD Leads To Delays, Errors, And Ongoing Frustrations

Source: ValGenesis

By Ryan Chen, Product Strategist, ValGenesis

GettyImages-1358835459-computer-gear-digital-hands

Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) is often seen as a technical checkpoint in drug development—but it’s far more than that. CMC teams are responsible for ensuring consistent quality and compliance across a complex ecosystem of formulation, analytics, manufacturing, and regulatory strategy. Yet many still rely on manual Quality by Design (QbD) processes that introduce delays, errors, and inefficiencies. This article explores how digital, AI-enhanced QbD frameworks are transforming CMC by streamlining workflows, improving traceability, and accelerating decision-making. It also highlights the hidden costs of manual methods—from lost context to team burnout—and makes a compelling case for why intelligent QbD isn’t just a modernization effort, but a strategic advantage.

If your organization is still managing QbD through spreadsheets and emails, it may be time to rethink your approach.

access the Article!

Get unlimited access to:

Trend and Thought Leadership Articles
Case Studies & White Papers
Extensive Product Database
Members-Only Premium Content
Welcome Back! Please Log In to Continue. X

Enter your credentials below to log in. Not yet a member of Bioprocess Online? Subscribe today.

Subscribe to Bioprocess Online X

Please enter your email address and create a password to access the full content, Or log in to your account to continue.

or

Subscribe to Bioprocess Online