Article

Soluble Versus Insoluble Expression In Microbial Fermentation

Source: Lonza

By Nikolay Krumov, Senior Project Leader, and Jonas Mueller, Team Manager, Lonza Biologics

GettyImages-1214112149-lab-team-collaboration-research

The biopharmaceutical market is growing at a significant pace, with two expression systems dominating production of drug products ― mammalian and microbial. With the exception of large macromolecules, such as full-length monoclonal antibodies and bi-specifics, most therapeutic protein classes are made in microbial systems, including recombinant proteins, enzymes, subunit vaccines, as well as novel formats such as antibody mimetics, antibody fragments, and nanobodies. This is especially the case where protein glycosylation is not a functional requirement.

Bacteria, the microbial workhorse expression system, is actually four potential systems in one. The bacterial cell can produce proteins in the soluble form in the cytoplasm or the periplasm, secrete them into the cultivation medium, or express them as inclusion bodies (IBs) in the cytoplasm. This diversity in production channels reflects the diversity of proteins expressed in bacteria, but direct influence on the expression mode is often limited. Expression of inclusion bodies has historically suffered a bad reputation in the industry. Download the full article to learn more about how these two routes, soluble and insoluble, compare in terms of their advantages and challenges.

VIEW THE ARTICLE!

Get unlimited access to:

Trend and Thought Leadership Articles
Case Studies & White Papers
Extensive Product Database
Members-Only Premium Content
Welcome Back! Please Log In to Continue. X

Enter your credentials below to log in. Not yet a member of Bioprocess Online? Subscribe today.

Subscribe to Bioprocess Online X

Please enter your email address and create a password to access the full content, Or log in to your account to continue.

or

Subscribe to Bioprocess Online