Video

How To Avoid A Biosimilar Comparative Efficacy Study, If Possible

Source: Bioprocess Online

Few companies, if any, would ever eagerly volunteer to perform a comparative efficacy study (CES) for their biosimilar candidate. The FDA has been clear all along that compelling a CES remains a tool in its toolbox if the agency believes it's necessary. So what might trigger one, and how can companies avoid it?

During Bioprocess Online Live: Process Control's Increasing Role In Biosimilar Approval, Cecilia Michel, managing director and head of research and development strategy at Alvotech, said the comparative analytical assessment (CAA) is key. The analytical package should include at a minimum orthogonal assays, both physical/chemical, potency, and binding, among others, to truly understand your molecule and its mechanism of action.

Early and ongoing engagement with the FDA is also important.

access the Video!

Get unlimited access to:

Trend and Thought Leadership Articles
Case Studies & White Papers
Extensive Product Database
Members-Only Premium Content
Welcome Back! Please Log In to Continue. X

Enter your credentials below to log in. Not yet a member of Bioprocess Online? Subscribe today.

Subscribe to Bioprocess Online X

Please enter your email address and create a password to access the full content, Or log in to your account to continue.

or

Subscribe to Bioprocess Online