White Paper | April 12, 2012

Biodecontamination Of Animal Rooms And Heat-Sensitive Equipment With Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide

Source: STERIS Corporation

Common methods used to decontaminate and disinfect laboratory animal areas are difficult to standardize, labor-intensive, and potentially hazardous for staff members and the environment. As an alternative to traditional methods, we tested fumigation with vaporized hydrogen peroxide by using the VHP 1000 Biodecontamination System. The design of our air-conditioning system allowed the connection of the generator to any animal room by using the ventilation piping, thus forming a closed circuit. A 3-h cycle consisting of dehumidification, conditioning, sterilization, and aeration was developed and shown to be effective. The biodecontamination process was monitored during five independent trials using chemical and biological (Bacillus stearothermophilus spores) contaminants. Contact plates for testing surfaces and room air for environmental bacteria, yeasts, and fungi consistently showed fewer than 10 colonyforming units per 100 cm2 or per 1 liter air. In addition, this method proved successful with heat-sensitive equipment like the blower units of individually ventilated caging systems. Overall, the system was easy to use and very effective in biodecontaminating animal rooms and equipment in a reproducible manner. There were no signs of corrosion or functional damage after more than 10 fumigation cycles. Work load and potential health risk for staff members and the environment was negligible.

A variety of methods and antimicrobial agents have been used for the periodic decontamination of critical environments. These methods generally are difficult to standardize, labor-intensive, and potentially hazardous for staff members and the environment. Conventional wipe-down techniques with antimicrobial products are very time-consuming and difficult to standardize. For disinfecting laboratory animal rooms and temperature-sensitive (nonautoclavable) materials, it is general practice to use spraying, fogging, or fumigation techniques, in particular with formaldehyde-based agents. Traditional fumigation with formaldehyde may be effective, but it is slow, difficult to standardize, and disruptive, but more importantly, toxic and carcinogenic. For these reasons, the use of formaldehyde has been strictly regulated by authorities for some years.